Site Meter

Monday, August 21, 2006

Christian Science Monitor: "Overexposure: When media coverage blocks out the sun"

A relevant article on the state of the media ( the mainsream North American media to be exact) and how they cover things today. A lot of issues that we worry about are the issues in the media. When the issues arent there then we arent worried. ( We being the muslim community and/or the general community). An example was the cartoon issue which came and went at the will of the media. It was an issue before the media made it an issue and then it died down while it is still an issue right now! ( as in things really did not change when the issue died down) Moreover if we divide each issue into subsets, the media really wants focus on one subset. In other words they define the frame with which each issue is looked at. Do you remember Hurricane Katrina? I thought and think the ammount of coverage the event initially received and the coverage it receives one year after the event is immensely dispropotional. Dont we want to know what happened to the thousands of people who got displaced? Same can be said about other disasters. Anyways please do read this article:

"It is an enormously complicated world, and every day, all over, things happen that matter. It may sometimes seem that stories come from nowhere, like the terrorist attacks on 9/11. But it's often the case that these events are surprises only because we weren't paying attention, and we probably weren't paying attention because the media weren't paying attention.

There are reasons people buy books or pay to see movies. Plots are nice. Stories move from A to B to C and at the end,generally, everything is tied together nicely. But the news isn't amovie or a book. Stories rise and fall and rise again, and they usuallydon't do it in a linear, neat way." Click here to read more

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh no.. You really are becoming more regular.. I've been searching for what to blog about.. I may just have to outdo you and post something now..

By the way, I'm not technically a "Baji" but thanks for the link :-D

Anonymous said...

Asalaamu Alaikum. Well thanks for the respect. I agree.. quality, not quantity. However, I do feel the need to blog and when I can't find something I get upset.

And you're right. If you wrote Auntie.. I'd be very worried. And it does make sense because it does mean Sister.. I'm not used to it because everyone I know is pretyt much older than me.. and anyone who calls me sister.. calls me Sister Munzareen.

Anyhow, that graph with the nafs.. That was pretty funny though I know that was probably not the intention.

Anonymous said...

BAJEE?!??! You're like older than me........

Anonymous said...

Heh :oops:
I thought baji was close to aunty and I've understood it to be someone offensive if you call someone who is not that older than you 'baji', but if it's out respect then khalas :) Jazak Allahu khair sidi for the link up I'll link you back insha'Allah.

Danya

Anonymous said...

Baji is aight, its nice. Now if someone calls me Auntie or Khala...fear the wrath of Jenn. >:-0 lol jk

Din said...

laugh out loud.

I never got used to saying sister. I am most conmfortable when I say baje!

I recall there was a time when I called my cousin auntee just because she had just had a kid. She didnt like it one bit.

I have been careful since. Bajee anger can be dangerous. Hazerdous to health and not good for the mind :).